SACH-SAWCH

We don't throw publications at problems. We start with 'Are you having a problem' ? Then, looking at what is happening, ask: “Do the findings better fit the stated problem or simply respond to it or minimize it?” More forgiving: Could it be true that SOME of the knee flexion and SOME of the plantar flexion is compensatory. This is like getting off a long bus ride one block too soon. Can live with it. Functionally, every zig needs a zag. The zig may be hard to see when the zag is obvious but compensatory. If mobility control treatments are rendered by single joint, the chances of catastrophe are great unless this is taken into account. We do not want to excise compensatory mechanisms. We want the patient to not require using them. For example we have two structural zigs in the leg, They are quite out of balance. Short of surgery, how to make do? Increase both zigs in a way that centers them offsetting displacement at another level. Is THAT legal? It is written into the constitution. The.... Constitution of what we are – survivors.