HARP line tool

HARP

You will notice in this library that knee angle graphs get disproportionate attention. The reason is that just about every detail of walking that can be functionally benefited is also present in the knee graphs. One ring to rule them all my precious? Not obvious. But, it is all in there. This book is for the geeks but is not opaque. The academic approach is to get a p value of everything - starting with hair, then eyelids which we suppose have poor p values for associated effects on walking – unless they affect vision? Eventually they get to the p-values of toe nails affecting walking. What does that sci-ency method do to help us know what at a minimum a patient needs and what choices have the least scope and risk to satisfy? Not much. Couple that with dated terminology which is, today, really badly misleading. This is why you are here. You might want to read the

footprints in the MUD book first in order to cleanse yourself of the misinformation that current terminology throws at you.